Publications

Home » Publications » Page 8

Nanotechnology

This presents the insurance industry with significant challenges and opportunities. The paper recommends that assessing risk over the life cycle of these nanomaterials should be standard practice for the nanotechnology industry, as well as for their insurers and reinsurers.

2010-11-25T08:15:44+00:00November 25th, 2010|

Longevity Risk

The longevity paper finds that increased life expectancy will challenge society to provide adequate income to all individuals through old age. Consequently, demand for longevity risk mitigation solutions is growing, and life insurers should play an important role. However, their current capacity to take longevity risk onto their balance sheets is small relative to global longevity risk exposure.

2010-11-25T08:04:56+00:00November 25th, 2010|

CRO Forum Sustainability Framework August 2010

As a consequence of globalisation, public expectations have risen that businesses should behave responsibly and accountably in terms of minimizing their environmental and social footprint. Even though this footprint is low for the insurance industry due to the service nature of its operations, headline risk has nonetheless increased.

2017-05-10T20:05:29+00:00October 8th, 2010|

QIS5 TS High Level Issues

The CRO Forum and CFO Forum are pleased to be able to provide comment on the QIS5 draft specification, as prescribed in the QIS5 consultation. We welcome the openness to cooperation between us and trust that this is merely a point in our continuous dialogue.

2010-06-01T10:54:18+00:00June 1st, 2010|

QIS5 Detailed Feedback

The CRO Forum and CFO Forum are pleased to be able to provide comment on the QIS5 draft specification, as prescribed in the QIS5 consultation. We welcome the openness to cooperation between us and trust that this is merely a point in our continuous dialogue.

2010-06-01T09:02:52+00:00June 1st, 2010|

Why ‘expected future profits’ must be treated as tier 1 capital

The role of ‘expected future profits’ in determining a firm’s own funds is attracting much discussion, with suggestions that they should be excluded from tier 1 capital. We believe this is at least in part due to a misunderstanding of their nature – even the term ‘expected future profits’ is misleading and we prefer to refer to them as in-force cashflows.

2010-04-20T10:10:19+00:00April 20th, 2010|
Go to Top